Thursday, April 15, 2010

Something from THE

An editorial by Phil Baty in Times Higher Education refers to a comment by Janez Potocnik, former European Commissioner for science and research, that university rankings are now used to assess national economic strength.

He then goes on to indicate other uses of rankings and to provide some more information about the forthcoming THE rankings. It seems that universities will be ranked in six subject areas, one more than in the THE-QS rankings, with life sciences and biomedicine being divided into life sciences and "clinical, pre-clinical and health".

Also "(w)e will also judge subject strength on the full range of measures used in the overall table. We believe this will represent another great improvement."

There might be a problem here. If THE are going to publish subject rankings based on the indicators used in the overall rankings it would not make sense to use the proportions of international students and international faculty, student faculty ratios or citations per faculty for the whole university to determine standing in specific disciplinary areas. So, Thomson Reuters would have to collect specific data about the numbers of international students in the social sciences and so on. Getting accurate information about numbers of students and faculty is diffcult enough for a university as a whole but for each disciplinary area it would be close to impossible. In any case, in many universities the boundaries between disciplinary areas may not correspond to those used by Thomson Reuters.

The reference to ranking the top 200 universities is disappointing. There is an enormous unmet demand for valid information about universities around the world, not just the top 200. Thomson Reuters say they are collecting information about a thousand universities (down from "thousands" a few weeks ago). It would be a pity to waste it.

3 comments:

Mark Wilson said...

I was asked to participate in the THE Thomson Reuters reputational ranking last month (see http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~mcw/blog/2010/04/09/ranking-universities/).

One feature that bothered me is that I was asked to name the top 10 in various categories. I am not sure how all these top-10 rankings will be used to rank a larger set, but it is hard to imagine meaningful distinctions being made below 100, let alone 200. Perhaps you can ask someone how they intend to do it.

Anonymous said...

Even more harder is to think how a single person in the whole world is going to have a serious and profound knowledge of at least 10 universities in several categories from all over the world to be able to rank them according to his/her own personal opinion. How THE is going to account for this belongs to the realm of Science Fiction

Tehseen hasan bajwa said...

Thanks for this nice post. you are improving day by day
regards
india university admission